<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/res/preview.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Campaign Finance Institute Latest Releases and Analysis</title>
    <link>http://www.cfinst.org/press.aspx</link>
    <description><![CDATA[Latest Campaign Finance Institute Releases and Analysis]]></description>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:28:11 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>Feed43 Proxy/1.0 (www.feed43.com)</generator>
    <ttl>360</ttl>

<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">00ed32702e24e9a483f80c7b2f2f750e</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:28:11 GMT</pubDate>
<title>CFI’s Malbin Testifies before NY State Senate Hearing on Small-Donor Matching Funds</title>
<link>http://www.cfinst.org/Press/PReleases/13-04-25/Statement_by_Michael_J_Malbin_About_CFI&#37;e2&#37;80&#37;99s_and_NY_Senate_Republicans&#37;e2&#37;80&#37;99_Conflicting_Estimates_for_the_Cost_of_a_Matching_Fund_System_in_New_York_State.aspx</link>
<description><![CDATA[Apr 25, 2013<BR>Mystery solved. New York State’s Senate Republicans on April 24 finally released the background for their “estimated” cost of a public matching fund system in New York State. Their paper presented the cost as being $221.55 million per election cycle.<p><sub><i>-- Delivered by <a href="http://feed43.com/">Feed43</a> service</i></sub></p>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">15697408e1bdbb0b8e4a60e74ce86321</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:28:10 GMT</pubDate>
<title>Updated CFI Research on Public Matching Funds Proposal for New York State</title>
<link>http://www.cfinst.org/Press/PReleases/13-01-11/Money_vs_Money-Plus_Post-Election_Reports_Reveal_Two_Different_Campaign_Strategies.aspx</link>
<description><![CDATA[Jan 11, 2013<BR>The Campaign Finance Institute today is releasing its analysis of President Barack Obama’s and Gov. Mitt Romney’s fundraising through the two candidates’ post-election reports filed December 2012. The analysis strengthens the impression of an election in which the Obama campaign used fundraising as tool for money and mobilization, while for the Romney campaign it was just about money.<p><sub><i>-- Delivered by <a href="http://feed43.com/">Feed43</a> service</i></sub></p>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">b1997bdca6a09ad2e742d38821a97986</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:28:09 GMT</pubDate>
<title>VT and RI Had the Highest Percentages of Adults Contributing in 2010 and 2006 State Elections; NY, UT, CA and FL the Low...</title>
<link>http://www.cfinst.org/Press/PReleases/12-12-03/CFI_Study_on_Public_Financing_in_New_York_State.aspx</link>
<description><![CDATA[Dec 03, 2012<BR>New York State’s candidates for the legislature in 2012 raised 76% of their money (through the final pre-election disclosure reports) from donors who gave them $1,000 or more, and from interest groups. Only 8% came from donors who gave $250 or less. The balance between the state’s small versus large donors was almost the same in 2012 as in 2010 and 2008.<p><sub><i>-- Delivered by <a href="http://feed43.com/">Feed43</a> service</i></sub></p>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">4fd0030a7456bc0adaa4bbeec813b9ed</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:28:08 GMT</pubDate>
<title>Early Post-Election Look at Money in the House and Senate Elections of 2012</title>
<link>http://www.cfinst.org/Press/PReleases/12-11-07/Independent_Spending_Wars_Fought_to_a_Standstill_-_House_and_Senate_2012.aspx</link>
<description><![CDATA[Nov 07, 2012<BR>The congressional independent spending wars of 2012 may well have been a financial bonanza for local media outlets. There can be little question that more money for politics meant more income for those who produce, place and sell the time for media advertising. But when all the dust finally settles, it is not clear what the result meant for election outcomes.<p><sub><i>-- Delivered by <a href="http://feed43.com/">Feed43</a> service</i></sub></p>
]]></description>
</item>
<item>
<guid isPermaLink="false">854c57cdd2087f22eee988e890d74c49</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 07:28:07 GMT</pubDate>
<title>CFI's 2012 Independent Spending Update for November 2nd</title>
<link>http://www.cfinst.org/Press/PReleases/12-10-26/VIRGINIA_LEADS_SENATE_INDEPENDENT_SPENDING_AGAIN_THE_PAST_WEEK.aspx</link>
<description><![CDATA[Oct 26, 2012<BR>The Campaign Finance Institute continues to update its web tool showing outside spending in House and Senate Races. The Senate independent spending landscape remained fairly stable in the past week (through October 25th), with Virginia once again top race at $8.6 million spent, bringing the cumulative total for the race to $39.6 million. The Montana race was moved into the fifth spot this week with $3.6 million in spending, up from seventh last week.<p><sub><i>-- Delivered by <a href="http://feed43.com/">Feed43</a> service</i></sub></p>
]]></description>
</item>


  </channel>
</rss>
